Saturday, October 5, 2013

The Nature of Apocalyptic Writing

Revelation is the only book in the entire Bible that promises a blessing for reading aloud (public teaching), hearing, and keeping the words of the prophecy (Rev. 1:1-3). Other books do not begin with this specific promise. Since there is a blessing promised, it seems obvious there is something unique about the book besides the apocalyptic imagery.

The promised blessing also makes it evident that God intends us to learn from and understand the book. After all, what blessing can there be in something we do not understand? Paul made this point plainly in 1 Cor.14:6-12 where he said " If I come to you and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction?...If the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle?...Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying? You will just be speaking into the air."

Revelation has been neglected to the detriment of Christians. It is the major source of Christian prophecy about what will come to pass beginning with John's own day. The book details prophecies seen in briefer form in other New Testament books. Unfortunately the reason we do not study Revelation is that the apocalyptic imagery causes most to lose their way. Revelation abounds with symbols and figurative language and in style is considerably different from most of the New Testament. Apocalyptic literature must be understood to fully understand Revelation. Even the name of the book comes from the Greek title απoκαλυπσoσ (Anglicized as apocalypsos) which means "revealing" or "disclosure."

God means for Revelation to be understood by Christians who will spend the time to study His Word in depth. Other New Testament books have individual passages which use apocalyptic imagery, so the idea should not be foreign to us. As I noted previously, one interpretive principle is that symbols and passages that have parallels elsewhere in Scripture should be compared and the meanings abstracted. To see how this can work, consider the following parallel passages from Matthew, Mark and Luke:

Matt. 24 - This apocalyptic passage was understood by early Christians to refer to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and fled when the Romans began the war in Judea in 66 AD until the arrival of Roman armies at Jerusalem. There was a short time when the Roman armies surrounded the city but did not invade, letting people enter the city for Passover. Also, before the siege of Jerusalem began Vespasian returned to Rome to become emperor, leaving his son Titus in command of the armies. This caused a delay in the Roman military conquest as well. ("If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened"). It is obvious that early Christians understood this apocalyptic prophecy.

Mark 13:14-30 - Jesus prophesied in apocalyptic imagery: "The sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken...Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened." Clearly this cannot refer to the end of the world unless first century Christians are still around today. This is a parallel passage to Matthew 24 and also refers to the destructions of Jerusalem in 70 AD.

Luke 21:5-33 - This is another passage parallel to Matthew 24 and Mark 13. In this passage, Jesus was asked about His prophecy that not one stone of the Temple would be left atop another. "When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written." Since this is a parallel, it represents an explanation of the apocalyptic imagery recorded in the other Gospels.

So how can we understand apocalyptic imagery? Before going into depth on an analysis, we need to understand the nature of apocalyptic writings. Apocalyptic passages contain predictive and apocalyptic elements. The word apocalyptic is an adjective that designates either a secular or an inspired book where the theme(s) is developed through the use of symbols and visions. The following comparison/contrast between prophetic and apocalyptic styles may be helpful:

Prophecy And Apocalyptic Literature Comparison
Prophetic
Apocalyptic
In prophetic writing/preaching moral issues are emphasized.
In apocalyptic works the content is more predictive and the subject matter is more inclusive and wider in scope.
Prophetic writings are usually formatted as brief oracles (often poetic in nature) set within a biographical autobiographical or historical context.
Apocalyptic writings are usually in prose with occasional poetic interludes and are usually continuous in their view of history. They generally cover longer time periods and are more esoteric in nature.
Prophetic writings point toward a culmination of a Messianic or redemptive nature.
They emphasize that any spiritual and worldly powers that are adversaries of God are still under His control and will meet defeat when they oppose Him.
Emphasize divine intervention and control and plead for people to either be faithful or return to God.
Also emphasize divine intervention and plead for people to either be faithful but also tend to focus on punishment and reward in End Times (eschatology).
Use allegorical language that is generally easy to understand and clear to the reader or listener.
Characterized by symbols revealed in dreams and visions that should instruct and encourage the faithful.

It is important to understand that apocalyptic literature (both secular and inspired) flourished during times of crisis to God's people (either Jewish or Christians) when a formidable enemy threatened the life of His people or their faith. It was written during times of trial and stress. Because of the threat to His people, the comfort was placed into symbolism which those who knew Scripture could understand but which those who did not understand Scripture could not interpret.

Secular Apocalypses

Secular apocalypses became common among the Jews from the Maccabean period (circa 200 B.C.) until about 200 A.D. Secular Jewish apocalypses were patterned after the book of Daniel. Collectively these writings are known as the "Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha" of the Jews. (Pseudepigrapha = work written under a pseudonym). They include among others:

·         I and II Enoch (possibly alluded to in Jude 14-15).
·         Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs.
·         Psalms of Solomon.
·         Assumption of Moses (possibly alluded to in Jude 8-9).
·         The Apocalypse of Baruch (Baruch was Jeremiah's secretary or Scribe - Jer. 36:4. 45:1-5).
·         I and II Esdras.
·         The Sibylline Oracles.  

From this category, the uninspired works which were held in respect became collected into the Apocrypha (which also includes non-apocalyptic writings such as Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, and I and II Maccabees). The rest, which were less accepted, became known as the Pseudepigrapha.

Christians also wrote in apocalyptic style. Some of these were collected Into New Testament Apocrypha. These include the following:
 
·         Apocalypse of Peter.
·         Vision of Isaiah.
·         Shepherd of Hermas.
·         V and VI Ezra.
·         Apocalypse of Paul.

Inspired Apocalypses

The inspired apocalyptic books of Scripture in the Old Testament canon as it is generally accepted today are Daniel, Ezekiel, and Zechariah (although other books include apocalyptic passages). In the New Testament, Revelation is the only inspired apocalyptic book (although other New Testament books include apocalyptic passages). Note that these were all written during periods of severe persecution and were all designed to convey the message that God is in control. Their messages were designed to be understood by the faithful as reassurances but also to be obscured from outsiders (who would be judged). 

·        Daniel and Ezekiel (along with Jeremiah which has some apocalyptic imagery) all wrote during the period of Babylonian Captivity. God's people (Judah) were in captivity to the powerful Babylonian Empire and needed encouragement. Daniel and Ezekiel both wrote from the heart of the Babylonian Empire, while Jeremiah wrote more to the homeland area of the Jewish people.
 
·        Zechariah prophesied during the Persian Empire when the Jews returned to Judah to rebuild the Temple. The people were facing great persecution, and the purpose of the writing was to reassure the Jewish people that the Temple will be rebuilt, the kingdom of the Messiah will be established, and God's chosen people will be triumphant. 

·        John wrote Revelation during a time of severe persecution of God's people (Christians) by the great world empire of Rome. 

The Use of Symbolism in Apocalyptic Writing

Both the secular and the inspired apocalyptic writers used an elaborate system of cryptic symbols and figures of speech for the expression of spiritual ideas. The writer was faced with the task of seeing the invisible and portraying the inexpressible. The symbols and systems of interpretation, while clear to the initiated, were hard to understand for outsiders (including modern readers). The symbolism both of the secular and also of the inspired apocalypses is a system in which qualities, ideas, principles, etc. are represented by abstract images. The code of the symbols was as much a code as anything encrypted by secular means. It allowed safe communication which was unintelligible to those who do not know the code. Since understanding the symbolic code requires understanding God's Word in depth, anyone who would do an honest attempt at understanding it would need to be exposed to the power of God's Word. Some important notes: 

·        The symbols cannot be interpreted in the same manner as prose where the surface meaning is evident.

·        The symbols follow the same pattern of usage throughout Scripture. I discussed this in detail in my post on understanding the mountain symbol.

·        One of the main usages of symbolism is the symbolism of numbers. I plan to discuss this more thoroughly in a later post.

Evidence That God's Teachings Hidden From Outsiders While Revealed to Faithful

Many will object that God does not hide His teachings. I will agree that in general that is true, but God does not reveal all of His plans to those who are outside His people and particularly obscures things from both human and spiritual adversaries. Here are some examples that are not related to apocalyptic symbolism:

1.    Parables - The purpose of parables was to reveal God's will to those with faith, trust, and right heart but to conceal from enemies/opponents - including the Jewish and Roman secular leadership in Israel and even from religious leaders of the time who were nominally God's people

Evidence:

Mark 4:10-12 - The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables so that they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven! 

Matt. 13:10-17 - Why do you speak to the people in parables? He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. This is why I speak to them in parables." 

Luke 8:9-10 - The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand. 

Psalms 78:1-4 - My people, hear my teaching; listen to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth with a parable; I will utter hidden things, things from of old-things we have heard and known, things our ancestors have told us. We will not hide them from their descendants; we will tell the next generation the praiseworthy deeds of the Lord, his power, and the wonders he has done.

John 9:39-41 - Jesus said, "For judgment I have come into this world, so that the blind will see and those who see will become blind." Some Pharisees who were with him heard him say this and asked, "What? Are we blind too?" Jesus said, "If you were blind, you would not be guilty of sin; but now that you claim you can see, your guilt remains." 

So Jesus taught things that were obscured from the Jewish leadership because they first rejected hearing what He and through Him what God had to say. Their hearts were not attuned to truly following what God wanted. That should give us pause to reflect on our own hearts. Do we really want to understand God's Word or are we like the Pharisees and believe we see when our hearts are not attuned to God? 

2.    Progressive Revelation - God did not reveal everything at once, but chose to reveal elements of His plan in the fullness of time. The full nature, requirements and scope of God's redemptive plan for mankind was deliberately hidden until Christ's death and resurrection. This concept is known as progressive revelation. Another term for it could be revelation by stages. 

Evidence:

Col. 1:25-27 - Paul was commissioned to "present to you the word of God in its fullness - the mystery that has been kept hidden for ages and generations, but is now disclosed to the Lord’s people… To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory…" 

I Cor. 2:6-14 (especially verses 7, 8, and 14) - No, we declare God’s wisdom, a mystery that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory...The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit. 

God intentionally hid the sacrifice of His Son from those opposed to Him (and even obscured it from the disciples before the crucifixion). If he had fully revealed his plans, both the human rulers and the opposing spiritual enemies of God would have never allowed Jesus to be sacrificed. Instead, God forced His enemies into actually accomplishing their own destruction while they were thinking they were destroying His Son. 

3.    God Did Not Fully Reveal His Will to the Prophets or to the Angels - Similar to what I discussed above, God clearly stated that He did not reveal everything either to His prophets or even to the angels who serve Him in heaven. 

Evidence:

I Pet. 1:10-12 - It was not revealed to prophets or to angels but now is revealed to all how God would bring salvation for mankind, even though both the prophets and angels wanted to know. Instead, God saved that for those of us who want to do His will and follow His Son.

Matt. 13:16-17 - Many prophets and righteous people longed to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it.

Eph. 3:7-13 - God chooses "to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things. His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms..."

It is evident from both the above and from the previous point that God intentionally did not reveal His Will or His plans to the prophets or angels. But Scripture is also clear that he has revealed all of these things to us.

4.    Some Things Still Hidden Until End of Time - God has not revealed when the end will be, even to the angels, even to His Son. Those who try to say they can determine when the end will be are at best foolish and misguided. Even if they think they are trying to tell us God's will, in truth they are arrogant and saying they have information that God has told us we will not know until it is time. 

Evidence:
 
Mark 13:32 - But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

God Has Revealed All We Need

While it may not be possible to fully understand or agree on the "meaning" of all of the apocalyptic visions of Revelation, a Bible student who approaches the book prayerfully and with a good Scriptural background can understand and interpret the principal concepts and ideas contained within Revelation. There will always be some disagreement about specific points, but the main themes of the book can be understood and mastered. This is essential to counter much false teaching of the present era.

Deut. 29:29 - "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law." Although this was specifically directed to Israel under the law, the truth still applies today. God has revealed to us all we need and in fact has revealed virtually everything to Christians.

John 12:37-41 - Even though Jesus performed miracles (which have always been one sign that a prophet was speaking for God), many of the people (particularly the leaders) refused to believe. Because of their refusal, God allowed them to deceive themselves.

Matt. 11:25-27 - You have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children...No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.
 
John 16:13-15 - Jesus is our prophet and the Spirit is our interpreter in Christian age. Prophecy (God's Word directly revealed or illuminated by Spirit as in book of Revelation) is given by authority of God. The Spirit is speaking to us "what is yet to come".

No comments: